When Is Saying ‘No to Anti-Competitive Mergers’ Actually Anti-Competitive?
456 days ago
Expert Type *
Expert Type
Expertise *
Other
Legal
Technology/Software & Services
Risk & Compliance
Clearing & Settlement
Research
Communications & Marketing
Consulting
Accounting
Asset Management Solutions
Insurance
Wealth Management Solutions
Professional Services
Industry Categories *
Technology/Software & Services
Legal
Asset Management Solutions
Risk & Compliance
Professional Services
Accounting
Consulting
Insurance
Research
Communications & Marketing
Other
Clearing & Settlement
Wealth Management Solutions
Upload a square image that is approx. 200 x 200 px in size.
Expert Type *
Expert Type
Expertise *
Other
Legal
Technology/Software & Services
Risk & Compliance
Clearing & Settlement
Research
Communications & Marketing
Consulting
Accounting
Asset Management Solutions
Insurance
Wealth Management Solutions
Professional Services
Industry Categories *
Technology/Software & Services
Legal
Asset Management Solutions
Risk & Compliance
Professional Services
Accounting
Consulting
Insurance
Research
Communications & Marketing
Other
Clearing & Settlement
Wealth Management Solutions
Minimum Size 400x400 and Aspect Ratio 1:1
Back
456 days ago
Patomak Global Partners LLC - Banning bank mergers would act as a moat protecting large incumbent players from competition much the way JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon described the Dodd-Frank Act ten years ago. Banning mergers and acquisitions is anti-competitive and does nothing to help bankers or consumers.
Authored by: Keith Noreika and Bryan Hubbard