When Is Saying ‘No to Anti-Competitive Mergers’ Actually Anti-Competitive?
Posted by Katherine250 days ago
Expertise *
Accounting
Asset Management Solutions
Clearing & Settlement
Communications & Marketing
Consulting
Insurance
Legal
Other
Professional Services
Research
Risk & Compliance
Technology/Software & Services
Wealth Management Solutions
Industry Categories *
Accounting
Asset Management Solutions
Clearing & Settlement
Communications & Marketing
Consulting
Insurance
Legal
Other
Professional Services
Research
Risk & Compliance
Technology/Software & Services
Wealth Management Solutions
Expert Type *
Expert Type
Upload a square image that is approx. 200 x 200 px in size.
Expertise *
Accounting
Asset Management Solutions
Clearing & Settlement
Communications & Marketing
Consulting
Insurance
Legal
Other
Professional Services
Research
Risk & Compliance
Technology/Software & Services
Wealth Management Solutions
Industry Categories *
Accounting
Asset Management Solutions
Clearing & Settlement
Communications & Marketing
Consulting
Insurance
Legal
Other
Professional Services
Research
Risk & Compliance
Technology/Software & Services
Wealth Management Solutions
Expert Type *
Expert Type
Back
250 days ago
Patomak Global Partners LLC - Banning bank mergers would act as a moat protecting large incumbent players from competition much the way JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon described the Dodd-Frank Act ten years ago. Banning mergers and acquisitions is anti-competitive and does nothing to help bankers or consumers.
Authored by: Keith Noreika and Bryan Hubbard